ENGLISH
La vitrine de diffusion des publications et contributions des chercheurs de l'ÉTS
RECHERCHER

Comparative study of three 4D simulation software

Sanon, Stéphania et Boton, Conrad. 2024. « Comparative study of three 4D simulation software ». In Proceedings of the Creative Construction Conference (Praha, Czech Republic, June 29-July 02, 2024) Budapest University of Technology and Economics.

[thumbnail of Boton-C-2024-29768.pdf]
Prévisualisation
PDF
Boton-C-2024-29768.pdf - Version publiée
Licence d'utilisation : Tous les droits réservés aux détenteurs du droit d'auteur.

Télécharger (418kB) | Prévisualisation

Résumé

The gradual adoption of Four-dimensional (4D) simulation and its benefits underscore the increased interest in leveraging all its capabilities. Although widely used in AEC projects, 4D simulation tools are still explored for their ease of use, features, and potential. This report presents a comparative study of three 4D simulation software programs: Navisworks Manage, Synchro 4D Pro, and Fuzor. The analysis aims to evaluate their respective effectiveness for 4D simulation based on several criteria grouped into four main categories: collaborative features, 4D features, 3D features, and planning features. Regarding collaborative features, all three tools have comparable strengths, particularly in terms of file import and export. Navisworks Manage stands out for its compatibility with over 60 file formats, while Synchro and Fuzor distinguish themselves with their plug-in system, in addition to compatibility with certain formats, including IFC. In terms of 4D features, Fuzor takes the lead with its extensive capabilities and possibilities. Navisworks ranks second, meeting all criteria in this category, unlike Synchro, which is slightly behind due to its limitations. In terms of 3D features, Fuzor also excels, offering the ability not only to create 3D models but also to fully meet established criteria. Synchro follows, having an advantage over Navisworks with its ability to modify integrated models, even if only through simple subdivisions. Finally, for planning aspects, Fuzor and Synchro stand out for their numerous features, while Navisworks is in last place, offering more limited options for planning development.

Type de document: Compte rendu de conférence
ISBN: 978-615-5270-78-9
Professeur:
Professeur
Boton, Conrad
Affiliation: Génie de la construction
Date de dépôt: 05 nov. 2024 19:48
Dernière modification: 18 nov. 2024 15:30
URI: https://espace2.etsmtl.ca/id/eprint/29768

Actions (Authentification requise)

Dernière vérification avant le dépôt Dernière vérification avant le dépôt